Robby Krieger, né le 8 janvier 1946 à Los Angeles, État de la Californie. il est le guitariste du groupe The Doors et l auteur de nombreuses de leurs chansons telles que Light My Fire, Love Me Two Times, Touch Me et Love Her Madly.
The algorithm has a long history. I go back to the Persian mathematician Al-Quirizumi, who was active in the 9th century. At first, he used to refer to the 10th. But afterwards, I have a meaning of the procedure or how to solve the problem.
As artificial intelligence (AI) and data analysis capabilities are maximized, the importance of algorithm became larger. This is because there is no basic formula of personalized content recommendation.
Then, the algorithm is always subject to controversy. Each time you mention the bias of the portal news in Korea, the request is called the Algorithm . The claim that the algorithm should be regulated.
However, it is not a simple problem to disclose or regulate the algorithm. The algorithm is a kind of trade secrets in the enterprise. If you are indiscriminately disclosing, you may want to lose your competitive advantage. Besides, it is hard to disclose externally easy to understand. It is virtually impossible to explain simple clearly.
Personalized recommended algorithm only regulation ... Universal recommendation is not applied
The US Congress has been launched for solving this difficult problem. 4 US Democratic Households such as Anna Ewe, Frank Pallon Junior, Mike Doyle, and Jan Sherka Keys, the 4th (local time), introduces the Justice Against Malicious Algorithms ACT , I uploaded it.
Malignment Algorithm Prevention Act came out as part of a communication dignity for communication with one of the largest concerns of the US government and Congress.
1996, the Telecommunications Dynamics 230 , which was enacted, is defined as a mediation business, not the publisher . Thanks to this provision, platform operators do not have to have legal responsibility for the third party content.
The Malignment Algorithm Prevention Act is a border of the communication dignity to exclude the algorithm in the target. If the algorithm recommends serious mental and physical content, it allowed to water legal responsibilities for that platform.
Not all algorithms are regulated. The regulatory object of this law is personalized algorithm . The algorithm will not apply the unexpected privilege only if it is recommended for the information specific to the individual . Therefore, if you recommend the most popular content based on Big Data Analysis, this law is not applied.
The regulation of algorithms itself may sound a little absurd by listening. In some cases, the innovation service is like a criticism.
The US Congress has become a significant instrument of Francis Haoun, which is a faithbook internal accuracy, which is the rate of algorithms, despite this risk.
Haouen has recently criticized the Facebook algorithm through the Testimony of the US Senate Hearing. Facebook algorithms focus on recommending content that the user s participation is the most causing content. So, however, we criticized how to cause various side effects.
It is a claim of this algorithm policy that is more exposed to extreme political claims on Facebook. Sometimes, because of these customized content recommendations, young people are exposed to risks, or they are not less than the mental health.
Based on these many basis, Hausen argued that companies such as Facebook needs to be more legally responsible for algorithms, the core weapons of business. He said this was said to have been testimonated.
To revise the Telecommunications Dimensions 230, if Facebook allows Facebook to be more responsible for the results of a planned decision, it will abolish a ranking system that considers participation (maximization).
Social Network emphasized Facebook Main Target
Four members of Anna Eshu, the algorithm regulation law came on the extension of this claim. Maximization of Users , it is necessary to make the problem consciousness that the infinite traits of blind platform operators need to be required.
Unlike Twitter, which socced social media , Facebook has emphasized his identity as a social network service. It means that it is a service that puts more weight to information communication between users, rather than information distribution of large agencies, including media companies.
However, it was not only criticized that Facebook was not only stimulating to expand the user, but also the content that could be harmful to mental health. In this situation, it was confirmed that there was no doubt of the courageous testimony of Haugen, Haugen, which is internal accuracy.
Of course, regulation of algorithms is not simple. You can also raise the Innovation Services .
The US House of Representatives gave this regarding this, and only the personalized recommendation for the personalized recommendation . Search results for personalized services were excluded from the subject. It also decided to apply only to services, which were more than 5 million per month user .
The US government and the Parliament are committed to the recent responsibilities to the platform operators, and the Telecommunications Dynamics 230 is committed to the revised work. This released algorithm regulatory law is high even in this behavior. This is because it may shake the business model itself of large companies, including Facebook.
Comments
Post a Comment